Friday, June 9, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
Usamediaview
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Market
  • Economy
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Market
  • Economy
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

No, industrial subsidies do not benefit the country as a whole – Cafe Hayek

by usamediaview
April 26, 2023
in Economy
0
No, industrial subsidies do not benefit the country as a whole - Cafe Hayek
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Twitter

This new piece by National assessment My courageous Mercatus Center colleague Véronique de Raggi, a researcher affiliated with American Compass, has made clear how weak the arguments in favor of industrial policy and protectionism are.. Here are some excerpts from Vero’s essay (but read the whole thing)

American compass Recently produced A pieceWritten by Gabriela Rodríguez, describing the greatness of European industrial policy. Rodriguez uses European governments’ support for Airbus as a case study. You see, Airbus has sold more planes than Boeing by 2022, invested more in R&D, hired workers across Europe and has lower production costs thanks to strategic decisions by a few European governments to change things.

Rodriguez’s piece is part of a series of American Compass articles to highlight “lessons focused on the critical role of public policy in a productive market economy that supports families, workers, communities and entire nations.” Airbus’s experience contrasts sharply with that of Boeing, and is offered as evidence that “owning shareholders does not necessarily make for the most competitive or innovative companies.”

……..

As American Compass often does, this piece makes sweeping claims and doesn’t deliver. A contrast is drawn between two ways of doing business: the mindless, unfettered free market way, supposedly exemplified by Boeing, and the careful marriage of government and business, supposedly exemplified by Airbus. But this comparison is a cartoon, and to draw it, Rodríguez has to erase some important facts.

……..

Rodríguez does a poor job of assessing the real costs involved in adding Airbus to Europe and whether these are justified. It is important to answer these questions properly if it is to be argued that the subsidies and other privileges granted to Airbus have improved the lives of Europeans. But her department made no attempt to show that these subsidies and privileges — more than $200 billion in today’s dollars given to Airbus over the past 40 years — were beneficial to anyone other than Airbus and its executives, suppliers and employees. Is the industrial policy produced by Airbus positive for the European economy or the taxpayers in the countries that support it?

Europe’s slow economic growth over the past few decades, high unemployment and high debt are no proof of this theory. European countries have also seen the manufacturing sectors Reduction As a share of total employment since the 1970s, developed countries have been similar to those in other continents.

In order to make the case for industrial policy, it must be possible to demonstrate that it benefits not only the companies that receive government favors, but also the economies and taxpayers of the countries that have paid for these favors. This is important because energy and other resources driven by Airbus subsidies have to come from somewhere. Without subsidies, these workers and resources would produce other goods and services, so the value of those other goods and services must be weighed against the value of additional Airbus planes with subsidies and other privileges. Proponents of industrial policy never mention these pre-arranged goods and services, pointing out that their cost would be much lower than the cost of additional aircraft. Rodriguez only thinks that what we get is the best that can be found and that it is worth the cost.

……..

There are a few claims that are correct in the American Compass piece, but these are not disputed. First, Airbus is a government artifact. It was created by a coalition of governments and is funded by European taxpayers, including the Wood Agreement, where the planes do not have to repay the loan unless they make a profit on the world market. Second, it is true that Airbus is one of the two major airlines today, so it shows that large amounts of subsidies and other financial support do not always lead to failure. These are not new findings, especially considering that the sale of commercial aircraft (whether by Airbus or Boeing) is a geopolitical game where purchasing decisions are often driven by non-economic factors.

But in the end, I’m left wondering, as you must be, what should be the most widely applicable lesson of America’s compass here? Can highly regulated industries in which state corporations buy heavily, politics play a big role in ordering, and subsidized producers compete for government-sponsored orders “work” despite poor returns to taxpayers? Or does government intervention in some companies make countries and their economies better? America’s Compass certainly doesn’t prove the latter, and it doesn’t show that the former is the strategy to pursue for our national defense or our standing in the world. Because even if you buy the Airbus American Compass claim that it’s successful, all it’s saying for sure is that it’s successful. For the shareholders and the employeesNot for the people of Europe.

All that Rodriguez’s piece does is prove that some government interventions are not failures when is Only Measured in output and employment in selected industries. But no one denies that a company can build, survive, and command a large market share if fed billions in taxpayer funds in the form of subsidies and special perks. Airbus, for example, never had to pay back its debt until it received government loans for decades, and if it never turned a profit, it wouldn’t need to pay back a penny. Under these conditions, staying afloat in a duopolistic market is no mean feat.





Source link

usamediaview

usamediaview

Next Post
Katie Porter talks about Biden's reelection campaign on Late Night with Seth Meyers.

Watch Rep. Katie Porter make the right argument for Biden's re-election

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Adam Schiff, the committee that selected Jim Jordan, ripped the mask of Trump's cover

Adam Schiff, the committee that selected Jim Jordan, ripped the mask of Trump’s cover

5 months ago
Alex Ovechkin of the Capitals tied another NHL mark on the Flyers.

Alex Ovechkin of the Capitals tied another NHL mark on the Flyers.

5 months ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    About Us

    In usamediaview, you get all the updates happening in usa, the information which is related to the category of business, sports etc.

    Category

    • Business
    • Economy
    • Market
    • Politics
    • Sports

    Pages

    • About 
    • Contact us 
    • Privacy policy
    • Disclaimer
    No Result
    View All Result

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Market
    • Economy
    • Sports

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In